The US is the world’s pre-eminent military power, but the economic benefit of
that is hard to see...In the modern world, there is no observable relationship
between size of country and its standard of living. Small and large countries
are found among the rich and among the poor...Economic power is based on monopoly derived from being the only seller of a particular good or service, or on monopsony derived from being the only buyer. Such power is held by individuals and businesses, not by states. Dominance of an industry or activity is not the same as scale, though scale and dominance are loosely related. International trade is conducted by individuals and businesses, not governments, and it is individuals and businesses, not governments, that negotiate the division of the value added trade creates. The principal economic role of states is not to get in the way. They can impede the process of adding value through trade, protectionism or disruptive currency interventions. These actions damage their own businesses even more than they damage the businesses of other countries.
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Soft power vs. hard power
by
Patrick Thomas
The fallacy of equating economic power with clout. Choice excerpts:
Labels:
economics,
globalization,
international politics,
politics,
trade
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment